Which of the following best describes a commercial applicator not-for-hire?

A commercial applicator not-for-hire is best characterized by applying pesticides only on properties that they control. This means that their work is limited to locations where they have direct ownership or management responsibility, which distinguishes them from those who apply pesticides as a service to external clients.

This definition is important in the context of pesticide application regulations, as it outlines the scope of authority and responsibility for the applicator in managing pesticide-related risks. Such applicators must adhere to specific guidelines and practices that ensure the safety and compliance of pesticide use on their own properties.

In contrast, other choices imply broader scopes of work or responsibilities that do not align with the defined term of a commercial applicator not-for-hire. For example, working exclusively with governmental entities or applying pesticides in residential homes suggests a variety of different roles, while frequently sub-contracting services indicates a business model focused on offering services to external clients rather than solely managing their own properties.